Technoglitch
Core Member
Then one thing, why Anna Hazare quit AAP?
He didn't quit AAP actually AAP was created after he got separated from Kejriwal and co.Then one thing, why Anna Hazare quit AAP?
But kejriwal offer him to join aap but he rejected. ...He didn't quit AAP actually AAP was created after he got separated from Kejriwal and co.
Yes he was against him for joining politics so he rejected his offerBut kejriwal offer him to join aap but he rejected. ...
Good points shared by Shiwesh KumarFew questions from my side -
1. Kejriwal said if Anna asks me to not form a political party I will not form. Anna said next day - don't form a political party. What happened next?
2. In 2013 Kejriwal said, Kiran Bedi is like my sister. I want her to join AAP and will make her CM. Was she not good and capable person at that time or has she changed as a person now?
3. Kejriwal says, 49 days were fantastic. If so, then he must be doing some really good work and that must be benefitting people. If that is the case then you must continue to do your good work unless others pull support from you. Because things are always in totality. Even if without Lokpal he was able to take forward development and safety agenda of people, he should have continued.
4. If the worst hit, backward, needy aam aadmi stays in Delhi only? Do we have better states/cities to do really service for people. If more than media coverage people are important then would I not serve in Bihar, Odisa or Telangana?
5. If contesting head on against Modi, Shiela Dixit was important, why is it not important now to contest from where Kiran Bedi is consting. Does he understand that logic now why those who are serious of forming government need to first ensure he wins and his party wins rather than going into reality show for media called 'contesting head on'? Meaning if you want you don't have future you become phantom and when you know you have job to finish you become serious?
6. Nation was fighting against corruption and slowness of development agenda and wanted a change in 2013. This was outcome of a long 10 years of governance and prior governance, family politics etc etc. Now that changed in 2014. The change is yet to be tested. AAP kept telling people fight against that party fight against corruption of that party. That party loses. Now again with same intesity you are asking me and telling me fight against this new party, fight against this new party? Has this party done enough to lose the trust to level of 44 seasts? Should time of 60 years and resultant distrust come within 8 months or in fact even before that? Or is it simply the case where you want to fight against an opponent whether people need replacement or not.
