Review Happy D2h Customer

[aumnamonarayan]

True, i am also activating my Airtel connection as i am not happy with Videocon's hardware and software

 

[Technoglitch]

D2h would launch another HD box in partnership with broadcommc chip, so that wont be as buggy as the current ones.

 

[DashMajor]

Never got hassle free experience in my 1.5 yr subscription due to it buggy STBs and remotes and even coz of false balance deductions and all craps..

Seems you're one of the unlucky customers

 

[DashMajor]

D2h was good for packages but not now ...after HD access fee policy no one would be ready to pay 125 rs for bad HD experience due to its STBs
I'm almost ready to go for TS DVR ...but only think that stops me is 2 channels : 9XO and TravelXP HD
If TS adds these two channels then I won't use d2h even for 1 min. Longer

Once geekvishal Bro. said that d2h is serious about business and HD Access Fee is the result of that seriousness

 

[NinadG]

True, i am also activating my Airtel connection as i am not happy with Videocon's hardware and software

Surprised to read this.......better to upgrade to new 4k STB with loads of feature......

 

[Devesh]

True, i am also activating my Airtel connection as i am not happy with Videocon's hardware and software

Surprised to see this......

 

[Teufel]

Once geekvishal Bro. said that d2h is serious about business and HD Access Fee is the result of that seriousness

It's still fine, but their HD Access Fee has many flaws. They have copied TataSky, but they don't know much about their HDAF. On TataSky HDAF is applied to all add-ons, which is cheaper option than a-la-carte.
But HDAF fees is only about business, I can't deny it. It's not good for us, but they definitely enjoy.

 

[Deep Patel]

That's why I'm with TS when it comes HD access fee ...they provide good HD services with 125 rs...and d2h gives crappy lagging and freezy HD experience in 125 rs!!!
I don't know what d2h thinks about themselves? And how can they compare themselves with TS??

 

[IndianMascot]

It's still fine, but their HD Access Fee has many flaws. They have copied TataSky, but they don't know much about their HDAF. On TataSky HDAF is applied to all add-ons, which is cheaper option than a-la-carte.
But HDAF fees is only about business, I can't deny it. It's not good for us, but they definitely enjoy.

I have a different view on this. D2h is still not applying HDAF on a la carte which is good as compared to Tata Sky which forces it's user to subscribe to HDAF even for a subscription of single HD channel. So, for me its d2h which have mastered the HDAF implementation in terms of customers.

 

[Technoglitch]

i would say HDAF is totally unacceptable from the customer's view but the company sees opposite of that.