DashMajor
EntMnt Knight
FDI for investment and to stop importing.Nope. Aviral Sangal concern is that when India is solid enough is loco manufacturing and exporting then why FDI is required.
FDI for investment and to stop importing.Nope. Aviral Sangal concern is that when India is solid enough is loco manufacturing and exporting then why FDI is required.
Does both are similar and difference, until and unless we don't have a prove in draft of Govt. rule then how can we judge that.So why did BJP opposed that during UPA govt Now why are they trying to show off that they are concerned for fdi this is utter maska lagane wali kaam
FDI for investment and to stop importing.
of course yes. i got ur point but Govt. is not fooled. even congress did that in 1991 n it boosted the indian econmoy like anything.Giving stake to outsider means that you are giving everything control into their hand. When you start walking with the help of stick then you will never feel confident to walk without it. This is FDI.
I am not against FDI but when its not required then we should avoid it.
How is China working. Do they too have so much FDI in their economy.
Monitoring is required on FDI, China constantly monitor and even took tough decisions when needed.Giving stake to outsider means that you are giving everything control into their hand. When you start walking with the help of stick then you will never feel confident to walk without it. This is FDI.
I am not against FDI but when its not required then we should avoid it.
How is China working. Do they too have so much FDI in their economy.
similiaities? nahin samjha bhai ji aap kya kehna chahate ho.If you are not importing then what's the use of investment.
To manufacture products in India not in Indonesia.If you are not importing then what's the use of investment.
yes. totally agree.To manufacture products in India not in Indonesia.