aumnamonarayan
EntMnt Contributor
Reliance is shutting its DTH business. Read it in an article two days back
Rupert Murdoch would have owned Tata Sky but he can't as any broadcaster having a stake in DTH, can't hold more than 20% in direct ways. Last they Star increased its stake by 10% in Tata Sky, that was thru indirect optionSun, RDTV, Tata Sky and D2h may got sold out.
Rupert Murdoch would have owned Tata Sky but he can't as any broadcaster having a stake in DTH, can't hold more than 20% in direct ways. Last they Star increased its stake by 10% in Tata Sky, that was thru indirect option
yes. u r right.100% FDI means 100% share. Isn't it ? or is it different. I am not clear about this.
please clarify what is indirect option as i have never heard it. please clarify. its a request only.Rupert Murdoch would have owned Tata Sky but he can't as any broadcaster having a stake in DTH, can't hold more than 20% in direct ways. Last they Star increased its stake by 10% in Tata Sky, that was thru indirect option
foriegn broadcasters cant hold more than 20% in content distribution platforms or in news sector?100% FDI means 100% share. Isn't it ? or is it different. I am not clear about this.
that too includes.and in DTH ?
Any broadcaster can have stakes either in DTH or in MSO tats the rule.
Hence Subhash Chandra left Chairman post of dishtv and remain Chairman of Siti Cable and ZEEL.
Indirectly though he's family controlling everything but fulfilled the law.
Any broadcaster can own anything of DTH or MSO 100%