Sanjeev
Core Member
But had BBC have not shown the documentary toh yeh discussion hota kya
News Delhi HC stays telecast of film on Nirbhaya; MIB asks channels not to show excerpts
- Thread starter Deepu
- Start date
Sanjeev
Core Member
Even Zee News is so concerned about Nirbhaya family that they want BBC to quit India and all they are just doing it for trps purpose agar yeh matter aata hi nahi to zee news wale to kuch bolte bhi nahin they just need this topic to gain attention also other channels want to wash their hands in this
DashMajor
EntMnt Knight
Yeh so why they have shown ? In this world thousands of movies and documentaries have been produces but only some 500 have broadcast because of 50% carries some controversy which no wants to relive and remind. You tell me 1 correct reason to broadcast it also they broadcast that documentary before schedule by knowing anyone, whosoever keep on watching BBC 4 able to tune it but question is why so much hurry of BBC to Broadcast it ? Whats the purpose to showcase those things ?
DashMajor
EntMnt Knight
Yeah so who gave them a matter ? Everyone want BBC just not to airs it but they airs it even after official ban from UK also ? So what BBC wants to show to air that documentary ?
Sanjeev
Core Member
But why only Zee is so concerned about that is it because dish tv has removed BBC channel
Technoglitch
Core Member
i watched the documentary and this is my opinion.
1.it is not derogatory, offensive and defensive to all but projected the woman, her dreams and how the future is gone and throughout the film, she is the hero
2.It covered all the person's POV and their opinions even the person who rescued the victim
3.The victims boarded the bus around 9pm and they were thrown out in the road around 11:30pm.
4.The others interview might be edited due to more offensive in nature and even the accused lawyers speech was so horrific that they are living in the stone age era.
5.The protests were the tipping point as this case was the rarest and most horrific in nature.
6.The juvenile is still under 18 years and hence the identity was covered.
7.The accused families were dependent on the persons' income and the wife doesnt care about his actions but her safety.
1.it is not derogatory, offensive and defensive to all but projected the woman, her dreams and how the future is gone and throughout the film, she is the hero
2.It covered all the person's POV and their opinions even the person who rescued the victim
3.The victims boarded the bus around 9pm and they were thrown out in the road around 11:30pm.
4.The others interview might be edited due to more offensive in nature and even the accused lawyers speech was so horrific that they are living in the stone age era.
5.The protests were the tipping point as this case was the rarest and most horrific in nature.
6.The juvenile is still under 18 years and hence the identity was covered.
7.The accused families were dependent on the persons' income and the wife doesnt care about his actions but her safety.
DashMajor
EntMnt Knight
dishtv removed it because of political reasons otherwise BBC is not that they can't pay carriage fee.
Sanjeev
Core Member
What political reasons
DashMajor
EntMnt Knight
Tat only they knows even they criticizing BBC political agenda by shielding this matter though whatever they made if Nirbhaya's Father - Mother are comfortable with the documentary then world's no power has any rights to do anything with.
IndianMascot
Core Member
This is absurd. Don't drag such points here.