News Delhi HC stays telecast of film on Nirbhaya; MIB asks channels not to show excerpts

NinadG

EntMnt Contributor
Finest Member
According to some news paper reports, the producers of the docu film got approval from jail authorities in 2013. Producers Leslee Udwin & her Indian agents used a middleman named Khullar to get the approval.

Later they tried to arrange interview with the accused Mukesh Singh. But he was not ready & asked Rs 2 lakh for the interview. Producers met his family members, negotiated the amount & convinced them for the interview. Finally Mukesh Singh was ready to give interview for Rs 40000.

So if all this is true, then apart from outraging the modesty & insulting women as per IPC 354 , producers have used money to lure accused to give an interview. So one can say that producers might have scripted the interview for the accused Mukesh Singh.

Jail authorities have now booked film co-producer Anjali Bhushan for the offence.
 

NinadG

EntMnt Contributor
Finest Member
Khullar is the middleman agent who managed Jail authorities & facilitated the approval for the interview.
So its possible that the producers might have used money to get approval thru Khullar.
 

IndianMascot

Core Member
:wtf: If this is correct and that bastard has been paid 40,000 BBC should be banned completely to operate in India and their broadcasting rights should be seized immediately.
 

Mr.A.N

EntMnt Regular
EntMnt Regular
Interesting fact they named the victim in documentary n number of times ...

But never named the juvenile just because if they do it will be not secular .

One should completely ban BBC in India
 

DashMajor

EntMnt Knight
OK I don't knows about it when I saw documentary I thought that kid rapist name is Juvenile but later realized that how can a illiterate give a name like this ? and tat in English ? So Nirbhaya identity is exposed since she's victim and died and Juvenile's whole life remain to rape other women's and plays with intestines so identity kept in secret even his mothers.
 
Top