DashMajor
EntMnt Knight
At 4 o'clock Tuesday afternoon, Fox News went off the air in the U.K. But why its parent company decided to pull the network from Britain's airwaves is the question.
The channel's parent company, 21stCentury Fox, said it was a matter of poor ratings.
"Fox News is focused on the US market and designed for a US audience and accordingly, it averages only a few thousand viewers across the day in the UK," the entertainment and television conglomerate said in a statement to NPR. "We have concluded that it is not in our commercial interest to continue providing Fox News in the UK.
The network's market size is important, because 21st Century Fox unveiled a $15 billion deal in December to buy the 61 percent of European media giant Sky that it doesn't already own.
The U.K.'s media regulator, Ofcom, has expressed concerns that the takeover of Sky would negatively affect the country's media and political landscape.
An Ofcom report in June concluded that the transaction "raises public interest concerns as a result of the risk of increased influence by members of the Murdoch Family Trust over the UK news agenda and the political process, with its unique presence on radio, television, in print and online."
Karen Bradley, the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, oversees media ownership and mergers. She has previously based her decisions on Ofcom's assessments, and while she hasn't yet made a final decision, she told Parliament in June that she was inclined to refer the deal to competition regulators.
"This potentially raises public interest concerns because, in Ofcom's view, the transaction may increase members of the Murdoch Family Trust's ability to influence the overall news agenda and their ability to influence the political process and it may also result in the perception of increased influence," she added.
"If she seeks a competition review, then it could create problems for Fox. Reviews can take up to six months to complete, potentially putting a decision off until 2018.
"But Fox is on the hook to pay a £170 million ($219 million) dividend to Sky shareholders if the deal doesn't close by the end of the year. If the deal is scrapped, then Fox will have to pay Sky £200 million ($258 million).
This time, there has been pressure on regulators to take into account the network's scandals in the U.S.: an array of sexual harassment lawsuits, and a now-retracted story that spread conspiracy theories about the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich.
There are also Britain-specific charges against the network, relating to its broadcasts on the day of the Brexit vote last June.
Ed Miliband, the former Labour leader and a longtime critic of Murdoch, told the Guardian that the decision to pull down the network was "yet more proof that the Murdochs can't be trusted to own 100% of Sky."
Fox News Goes Off The Air In Britain As U.K. Scrutinizes Company's Bid To Buy Sky : The Two-Way : NPR
The channel's parent company, 21stCentury Fox, said it was a matter of poor ratings.
"Fox News is focused on the US market and designed for a US audience and accordingly, it averages only a few thousand viewers across the day in the UK," the entertainment and television conglomerate said in a statement to NPR. "We have concluded that it is not in our commercial interest to continue providing Fox News in the UK.
The network's market size is important, because 21st Century Fox unveiled a $15 billion deal in December to buy the 61 percent of European media giant Sky that it doesn't already own.
The U.K.'s media regulator, Ofcom, has expressed concerns that the takeover of Sky would negatively affect the country's media and political landscape.
An Ofcom report in June concluded that the transaction "raises public interest concerns as a result of the risk of increased influence by members of the Murdoch Family Trust over the UK news agenda and the political process, with its unique presence on radio, television, in print and online."
Karen Bradley, the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, oversees media ownership and mergers. She has previously based her decisions on Ofcom's assessments, and while she hasn't yet made a final decision, she told Parliament in June that she was inclined to refer the deal to competition regulators.
"This potentially raises public interest concerns because, in Ofcom's view, the transaction may increase members of the Murdoch Family Trust's ability to influence the overall news agenda and their ability to influence the political process and it may also result in the perception of increased influence," she added.
"If she seeks a competition review, then it could create problems for Fox. Reviews can take up to six months to complete, potentially putting a decision off until 2018.
"But Fox is on the hook to pay a £170 million ($219 million) dividend to Sky shareholders if the deal doesn't close by the end of the year. If the deal is scrapped, then Fox will have to pay Sky £200 million ($258 million).
This time, there has been pressure on regulators to take into account the network's scandals in the U.S.: an array of sexual harassment lawsuits, and a now-retracted story that spread conspiracy theories about the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich.
There are also Britain-specific charges against the network, relating to its broadcasts on the day of the Brexit vote last June.
Ed Miliband, the former Labour leader and a longtime critic of Murdoch, told the Guardian that the decision to pull down the network was "yet more proof that the Murdochs can't be trusted to own 100% of Sky."
Fox News Goes Off The Air In Britain As U.K. Scrutinizes Company's Bid To Buy Sky : The Two-Way : NPR