Article Kashmir wanted to be independant country

Technoglitch

Core Member
In 1947, the kingdom of Jammu and Kashmir was asked to join with either India or Pakistan. But Maharaja Hari Singh, the unpopular Hindu ruler of the Muslim-majority region, wanted to stay independent.

However, local armed uprisings that flared in various parts of Kashmir, along with a raid by tribesmen from northwestern Pakistan, forced Singh to seek help from India, which offered military assistance on condition that the kingdom link itself to India. The ruler accepted, but insisted that Kashmir remain a largely autonomous state within the Indian union, with India managing its foreign affairs, defense and telecommunications.

The Indian military entered the region soon after, with the tribal raid spiraling into the first of two wars between India and Pakistan over Kashmir. The first war ended in 1948 with a U.N.-brokered cease-fire. Nonetheless, Kashmir was divided between the two young nations by the heavily militarized Line of Control, with the promise of a U.N.-sponsored referendum in the future.

In Indian-controlled Kashmir, many saw the transition as the mere transfer of power from their Hindu king to Hindu-majority India. Kashmiri discontent against India started taking root as successive Indian governments breached the pact of Kashmir’s autonomy. Local governments were toppled one after another, and largely peaceful movements against Indian control were suppressed harshly.

Pakistan regularly raised the Kashmir dispute in international forums, including in the U.N. Meanwhile, India began calling the region an integral part of the nation, insisting that Kashmir’s lawmakers had ratified the accession to New Delhi.

As the deadlock persisted, India and Pakistan went to war again in 1965, with little changing on the ground. Several rounds of talks followed, but the impasse continued.


In the mid-1980s, dissident political groups in Indian-held Kashmir united to contest elections for the state assembly. The Muslim United Front quickly emerged as a formidable force against Kashmir’s pro-India political elite. However, the United Front lost the 1987 election, which was widely believed to have been heavily rigged.

A strong public backlash followed. Some young United Front activists crossed over to Pakistan-controlled Kashmir, where the Pakistani military began arming and training Kashmiri nationalists.

By 1989, Kashmir was in the throes of a full-blown rebellion.

India poured more troops into the already heavily militarized region. In response, thousands of Kashmiris streamed back from the Pakistani-controlled portion with weapons, staging bloody attacks on Indian security forces and pro-India Kashmiri politicians. Indian soldiers, empowered with emergency laws giving them legal impunity, carried out a brutal military crackdown, leaving Kashmiris exhausted and traumatized. More than 68,000 people have been killed since then.

Kashmir rebels suffered a major setback after 9/11, when the U.S. pressured Pakistan to rein in the militants. Indian troops largely crushed the militancy after that, though popular demands for “azadi,” - freedom - remain ingrained in the Kashmiri psyche.

In the last decade, the region has made a transition from armed rebellion to unarmed uprisings, with tens of thousands of civilians repeatedly taking to the streets to protest Indian rule, often leading to clashes between rock-throwing residents and Indian troops. The protests are usually quelled by force, often resulting in deaths.


AP EXPLAINS: Why Kashmir has been torn by decadeslong strife - The Washington Post
 

Technoglitch

Core Member
The history stated that its ruler wanted Kashmir to be independant but due to Pak's invasion and tribals invasion its ruler seeked India's help which agreed on the condition that it needed to join India but it would be autonomous.
 

Prateek Marwadi

EntMnt Rockers
Finest Member
The history stated that its ruler wanted Kashmir to be independant but due to Pak's invasion and tribals invasion its ruler seeked India's help which agreed on the condition that it needed to join India but it would be autonomous.

Kashmir in the last signed with India so did the other regions as well.

Hyderabad also became the independent country before it becomes a part of India.
 

Prateek Marwadi

EntMnt Rockers
Finest Member
read the agreement, kashmir was never supposed to be part of india but just an annexure
Y u want to support anti national activities ?
I live in north India, on every second day every news channel debates on kashmir, terrorist, army n pakistan.

Its true that they were independent but later they agreed to become a part of india so they did.
POK is also a part of India and India must look into this.

Some anti national elements always do these type of things. Please do not read these type of articles.
 
Top