Breaking News Tatasky sued for misleading consumers. Amount could be 1650 crore

[SUNIEL]

Nagpal stated that we started special category as other dth started this type of ala cart services so this verdict from tata sky from ts then if they start ala cart cum special service like other dth then why hd access fee for that channels? This question will be ask to tata sky while proceeding case.

 

[ankit360]

Nagpal stated that we started special category as other dth started this type of ala cart services so this verdict from tata sky from ts then if they start ala cart cum special service like other dth then why hd access fee for that channels? This question will be ask to tata sky while proceeding case.

u r right . but it not make any sense . as almost 99.99 % people won't buy HD STB to watch only SWP HD

 

[Shiwesh Kumar]

Ok so you mean the hd access fee on sw premiere hd may go away but otherwise it may remain. Hd access fee is proving as heavy as dish tv's hd specific packs.

 

[Shiwesh Kumar]

Entire philosophy of tata sky is wrong. They kept waiting for gsat 10 for 4 yrs. then AGain waited 1 yr after launch of gsat 10. Then decided to migrate to mpeg4. Mpeg4 migration from any person who can foresee and make right strategy should have started somewhere in the middle of first 4yrs of wait.

Now if someone cant handle normal channel availability and migration aspect why should then become too ambitious and focus on products like active services, jingalaala stuffs, wifi remote, remote recording, vod, tata sky tv and what not. And innovation in terms hdaccess fee from their initial simple rules of hd packs.

 

[SUNIEL]

Ya, regulatory body cant force to remove hd access fee. But surly remove it from special.

 

[dipayan]

Entire philosophy of tata sky is wrong. They kept waiting for gsat 10 for 4 yrs. then AGain waited 1 yr after launch of gsat 10. Then decided to migrate to mpeg4. Mpeg4 migration from any person who can foresee and make right strategy should have started somewhere in the middle of first 4yrs of wait.

Now if someone cant handle normal channel availability and migration aspect why should then become too ambitious and focus on products like active services, jingalaala stuffs, wifi remote, remote recording, vod, tata sky tv and what not. And innovation in terms hdaccess fee from their initial simple rules of hd packs.

Your philosophy is also wrong as technology never stands still. So if you want to sustain in market you have to update according to market needs otherwise you will go-down like Nokia corporation or Blackberry or Kodak.

 

[SUNIEL]

Your philosophy is also wrong as technology never stands still. So if you want to sustain in market you have to update according to market needs otherwise you will go-down like Nokia corporation or Blackberry or Kodak.

and only because of this advance technology tata sky sustain in market despite being low count of channels. Online recharge facility, pack change facility are extremly great by tata sky

 

[IndianMascot]

Ya, regulatory body cant force to remove hd access fee. But surly remove it from special.

But it's not only SWP which is contradicting HD access fee, we have TEN HD also in which we are being forced to subscribe all 3 channels.

 

[IndianMascot]

and only because of this advance technology tata sky sustain in market despite being low count of channels. Online recharge facility, pack change facility are extremly great by tata sky

But now a days these kind of facilities are being provided by almost all service providers.

 

[ajuravi]

TDSAT or TRAI should bring in some rules like CAS when they introduced it by 2003....