News Delhi HC stays telecast of film on Nirbhaya; MIB asks channels not to show excerpts
- Thread starter Deepu
- Start date
Technoglitch
Core Member
remember this case?
As IndianMascot bro already said........ mental sickness, perverseness, lack of family bonding, loneliness, individualistic attitude, ..................................we can say its by nature & nurture.............even this can be due to genetics.....................So we can say that certain societies exhibits & nurtures the types which ultimately do all these kind of things......................
Technoglitch
Core Member
yes, he commited suicide
DashMajor
EntMnt Knight
Yeah Ram Singh and his Brother Mukesh who gave interview for this documentary.
Now, father of Delhi braveheart objects to 'India's Daughter'
The family of Delhi gang-rape victim has taken a strong exception to making public of their daughter's name in the BBC documentary and has warned of taking legal action in this connection.
"Despite clearly telling them not to make the name and photo of our daughter public, they have gone ahead with it and this is not right. We will take legal action against this," the father of the victim told PTI.
"BBC has thrown a challenge to the Indian government and we are confident that they will be given a suitable reply soon," he said.
He, however, said that they are happy with Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh and the alacrity with which he has responded and urged the central government to also pursue the matter in the Supreme Court so that suitable punishment is given to the convicts at the earliest.
Now, father of Delhi braveheart objects to 'India's Daughter' - Rediff.com India News
The family of Delhi gang-rape victim has taken a strong exception to making public of their daughter's name in the BBC documentary and has warned of taking legal action in this connection.
"Despite clearly telling them not to make the name and photo of our daughter public, they have gone ahead with it and this is not right. We will take legal action against this," the father of the victim told PTI.
"BBC has thrown a challenge to the Indian government and we are confident that they will be given a suitable reply soon," he said.
He, however, said that they are happy with Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh and the alacrity with which he has responded and urged the central government to also pursue the matter in the Supreme Court so that suitable punishment is given to the convicts at the earliest.
Now, father of Delhi braveheart objects to 'India's Daughter' - Rediff.com India News
Last edited:
This is more interesting to read............
Why the govt is right in banning the BBC film
As is the wont of the BBC, it has taken refuge under the 'freedom of speech' argument. It must be noted that it is a long established principle that freedom of expression does not mean a licence to shout 'fire' at a crowded place.
The government has indeed done the right thing by banning the documentary.
It needs to go a step ahead and prosecute the BBC and the filmmaker for malafide actions and impose a huge fine since despite the government ban the BBC aired it on its international channels.
There is indeed a precedent. Some years ago when the Irish separatist movement was at its peak, the British government had imposed a ban on broadcasting interviews with Irish separatists (Indian Anglophiles note: There is no such ban on Kashmiri separatists in India). The BBC defied the ban and paid the price.
The BBC, despite its pretensions of objectivity, has been an important tool in the hands of the West to advance its political agenda.
In 1984, at the height of the Khalistan movement, it broadcast a highly provocative speech by Jagjit Singh Chohan wherein he openly incited Sikhs to kill then prime minister Indira Gandhi.
Much later (and I was a witness to it) during the Hazaratbal crisis in Kashmir in the 1990s, it broadcast unverified reports of the shrine being gutted. The result was that an angry mob attacked army posts and many were killed in the firing.
A question to ponder for all Indians is this: Are we still (after 68 years of Independence) so slavish that we let a Briton walk all over us?
The debates in the print media and on news television have been a revelation of sorts. Many had the gall to justify the publicity for the rapist on the ground that the documentary merely shows the 'reality' of our country and holds a mirror to us.
This does not mean that rapes do not take place in India, they do. But if one were to see the statistics in perspective -- say the crime of rape per million population -- one will find that the incident of rapes in India is one of the lowest in the world.
India recorded a rate of 2 per million while the US figure is 30, 15 times more rapes per million population.
If we were to compare New York, 1/3 of Delhi in terms of population, yet had double the Delhi number of rapes. It is indeed true that many rape cases in India go unreported, but even the US has accepted that only 1/3 of these crimes are reported.
While rape is not unknown in other parts of India, the kind of boorish male behaviour that Delhi women suffer day in and day out has few parallels in the rest of the country.
It is from this socially backward countryside that hordes of migrants flock to Delhi in search of a better life. These rootless rural youth find the city culture alien and yet enticing. The anonymity that the city offers breaks down mental barriers to deviant behaviour and crimes against women are committed.
Read more at: Why the govt is right in banning the BBC film - Rediff.com India News
Why the govt is right in banning the BBC film
As is the wont of the BBC, it has taken refuge under the 'freedom of speech' argument. It must be noted that it is a long established principle that freedom of expression does not mean a licence to shout 'fire' at a crowded place.
The government has indeed done the right thing by banning the documentary.
It needs to go a step ahead and prosecute the BBC and the filmmaker for malafide actions and impose a huge fine since despite the government ban the BBC aired it on its international channels.
There is indeed a precedent. Some years ago when the Irish separatist movement was at its peak, the British government had imposed a ban on broadcasting interviews with Irish separatists (Indian Anglophiles note: There is no such ban on Kashmiri separatists in India). The BBC defied the ban and paid the price.
The BBC, despite its pretensions of objectivity, has been an important tool in the hands of the West to advance its political agenda.
In 1984, at the height of the Khalistan movement, it broadcast a highly provocative speech by Jagjit Singh Chohan wherein he openly incited Sikhs to kill then prime minister Indira Gandhi.
Much later (and I was a witness to it) during the Hazaratbal crisis in Kashmir in the 1990s, it broadcast unverified reports of the shrine being gutted. The result was that an angry mob attacked army posts and many were killed in the firing.
A question to ponder for all Indians is this: Are we still (after 68 years of Independence) so slavish that we let a Briton walk all over us?
The debates in the print media and on news television have been a revelation of sorts. Many had the gall to justify the publicity for the rapist on the ground that the documentary merely shows the 'reality' of our country and holds a mirror to us.
This does not mean that rapes do not take place in India, they do. But if one were to see the statistics in perspective -- say the crime of rape per million population -- one will find that the incident of rapes in India is one of the lowest in the world.
India recorded a rate of 2 per million while the US figure is 30, 15 times more rapes per million population.
If we were to compare New York, 1/3 of Delhi in terms of population, yet had double the Delhi number of rapes. It is indeed true that many rape cases in India go unreported, but even the US has accepted that only 1/3 of these crimes are reported.
While rape is not unknown in other parts of India, the kind of boorish male behaviour that Delhi women suffer day in and day out has few parallels in the rest of the country.
It is from this socially backward countryside that hordes of migrants flock to Delhi in search of a better life. These rootless rural youth find the city culture alien and yet enticing. The anonymity that the city offers breaks down mental barriers to deviant behaviour and crimes against women are committed.
Read more at: Why the govt is right in banning the BBC film - Rediff.com India News
Last edited:
DashMajor
EntMnt Knight
Another interesting point about the documentary is that, that kid rapist explained as Juvenile his actual identity has been hide completely even that accuse called him juvenile not by his name, his mother face has been blur protected. So its a complete protection to kid accuse profile but they're making tamasha of rape victim by calling her name thousand of times by everyone. That documentary name is India's Daughter J***** S***** not even "Nirbhaya".
Wah rey BBC thanks to protect rapist and insult rape victim.
Wah rey BBC thanks to protect rapist and insult rape victim.
DashMajor
EntMnt Knight
Why I have 100% of reason to prove BBC wrong. Who actually watch the documentary will know what BBC had been done here.