Technoglitch
Core Member
Present scenario is, anytime they can remove the channels from base pack and dont give DD sound in all HD channels.
Exactly.They are very arrogant to the customer queries.Scenario has not changed on that front.I am used to discussing with cc of dish TV and TS on behalf of my colleagues and I've been experiencing it even these days.between do they provide DD sound for all the HD channels? they are so arrogant that they would end the discussion by it is not available from the broadcaster itself.
So implementing HD access fee is the symptoms of good days.And so they removed Sony channels from base packs and made them a la carte! These are the good days!
That's what we wanted to say. CN91 bro is asking for suggestions between d2h and dishtv.If you suggest dishtv support it with facts , but don't denigrate d2h.You straightaway said d2h is crappy which is not right. Sanjeev .C bro suggested ADTV but did he say anything like you did about d2h?So implementing HD access fee is the symptoms of good days.
Leave it.
We can give many drawbacks of every DTH.
I said it that all DTH have pro's & con's.
Finally we have to choose what we ourself think good for us.
No need to agree
You don't want DD sound, you don't want Sony channels, you are not interested in so and so channels....but not everyone is like you.They have their preferences .I don't want dd sound.
So that's not a issue to myself.
All depends what a viewer needs from his chosen DTH.
So true of you unlike those blind supporters.Wrong thing is wrong I am not gonna increase my BP to prove that DTH right. Because I don't work for them it's not my personal property.
D2H is laggy in hardware side but package wise they're brilliant.
I never felt any problem with dishtv hardware but package is bad. No proper DD sound, bad PQ on some of the SD channels and their channel addition, removal keep screwing the experience of the package.
That's the fact and I support fact only.