Discussion Tata Sky 4K Vs Videocon d2h 4K

Shiwesh Kumar

EntMnt Ace
EntMnt Ace
I think all of you are right in some way. This is a known fact that content-wise tata sky is way behind (even if many other DTHs are behind in content, that does not make Tata Sky ahead). Several crucial SD and HD channels are missing. At the time when UHD is getting launched, remaining 40% behind in HD count is a big matter.

Now this is also a fact that on other factors than channel count, tata sky is way ahead. I guess all the members are saying and agreeing to this. Only thing is that the union of your individual opinions show complete picture of Tata Sky.

You have to also consider the factor that some of us have been associated with Tata Sky since 2006. And since 2010 they have been crying on space issue. Now either you don't cry or you resolve it. Depending on the period of wait, the level of frustration for different users can be different. We must respect that. 2010 to 2015 is a long time. Manhoman Singh becomes elected to a rejected PM in such span of time.

I left tata sky because of content and came back after trying other DTHs (dishtv, d2h, airtel). Left because of content shortage (example, Zee Cinema HD becomes available after 2years of launch, certainly I am not that patient person) and came back because none have such a quality product (although with limited content). Now my final solution is Tata Sky full Mega HD pack with 2 years subscription (because I know even in 2 years no one can beat tata sky in terms of quality of product. Unfortunately content is too low) and D2H with missing channels in form of a-la-carte. That overall works fine for me.

Final conclusion is - expectation is surely that if I have a mobile network subscription it must allow me to enable 2G, 3G, voice calling, SMS etc in all states of India. Meaning Tata SKy is a platform, then it must have all major channels at least which it does not. But we are yet to see a matured DTH industry in India (perhaps DTH portability can put some pressure) where DTH stops crying at least after 5 long years.
 
Last edited:

aumnamonarayan

EntMnt Contributor
I think all of you are right in some way. This is a known fact that content-wise tata sky is way behind (even if many other DTHs are behind in content, that does not make Tata Sky ahead). Several crucial SD and HD channels are missing. At the time when UHD is getting launched, remaining 40% behind in HD count is a big matter.

Now this is also a fact that on other factors than channel count, tata sky is way ahead. I guess all the members are saying and agreeing to this. Only thing is that the union of your individual opinions show complete picture of Tata Sky.

You have to also consider the factor that some of us have been associated with Tata Sky since 2006. And since 2010 they have been crying on space issue. Now either you don't cry or you resolve it. Depending on the period of wait, the level of frustration in different users can be different. We must respect that. 2010 to 2015 is a long time. Manhoman Singh becomes elected to a rejected PM in such span of time.

I left tata sky because of content and came back after trying other DTHs (dishtv, d2h, airtel). Left because of content shortage (example, Zee Cinema HD becomes available after 2years of launch, certainly I am not that patient person) and came back because none have such a quality product (although with limited content). Now my final solution is Tata Sky full Mega HD pack with 2 years subscription (because I know even in 2 years no one can beat tata sky in terms of quality of product. Unfortunately content is too low) and D2H with missing channels in form of a-la-carte. That overall works fine for me.

Final conclusion is - expectation is surely that if I have a mobile network subscription it must allow me to enable 2G, 3G, voice calling, SMS etc in all states of India. Meaning Tata SKy is a platform, then it must have all major channels at least which it does not. But we yet to see a matured DTH industry in India (perhaps DTH portability can put some pressure) where DTH stops crying at least after 5 long years.


Awesome Explanation, i completely agree. Shiwesh bro must say ur choice of words are really fantabulous
 

Shiwesh Kumar

EntMnt Ace
EntMnt Ace
Thanks all for good words. In short, Tata Sky is like "Shadi ka Laddu" - khanewala bhi pachtaye... na khanewala bhi pachtaye (the sweet of marriage - person who eats it or who does not eat both regrets)...and if you are not in love with Tata Sky, you don't criticise it. I have not seen anyone criticising RDTV.
 
Last edited:

bhaskarkilli

Core Member
Arre bhai again u r diverting the topic, i am talking about addition of channels and since u have no answer to defend Tata Sky so u r diverting it to other topics like Hardware , Software , Doby Sound.

Have i said anywhere that Tata Sky hardware is bad or D2H hardware is very good. My plain point is about channels which is the basic thing one expects from a DTH
Neither I am defending TS nor I am hating any other DTH.I am not saying TS is adding more channels, I am saying what TS is giving enough for me and if anybody thinks TS is giving very few channels they have to move any other DTH.What I am saying is every DTH having their own plus points and minus points according to our requirement we have to choose DTH.In my view not only TS none of the DTH is listening customer voice(dont say about only channels...it is your view and I am agreeing it but our customers having other concerns too).
 

Technoglitch

Core Member
There are million things to worry in this world and least of them is the DTH. Do remember that cost directly is proportional to the channel addition and don't blame ops if it happens.
 
Top