Interview with MD and CEO, Tata Sky

[IndianMascot]

Mr.Bhat , you got a point.

 

[SUNIEL]

This article clearing that tp is not in hand with tata sky. So this delay is from ISRO side, then what is meaning of ISRO press release before sat launch that satellite will be operational by november.

 

[IndianMascot]

And in Fact even Tata Sky officials have re-iterated the same words. So, Tata Sky is equally misguiding all.

 

[Mr.Bhat]

Thats y its not good to abuse or use harsh words towords any perticular DTH by any off us. One way or other no DTH is perfect.
Aage jaanevalli Gadhe ko peche waalli gadha hasa ke sab kuch dikthaa hai , lekin use bhee nahee pathaa hai uskee bhee sab kuch dikhthee hai

 

[SUNIEL]

And in Fact even Tata Sky officials have re-iterated the same words. So, Tata Sky is equally misguiding all.

they have not any info, but ISRO need to give all information to country, what are they doing.

 

[IndianMascot]

they have not any info, but ISRO need to give all information to country, what are they doing.

Tata Sky have all the info yaar. Its just because ISRO is a crocodile and no one messes with crocodile in a Sea. They have paid millions to ISRO and still sitting like mute spectator. They should have pressurized them to provide foreign satellite for temporary purposes.

 

[aumnamonarayan]

Well i think u didnt get the point.
I said > as per contract [quoted in article] ISRO has to give 12 TPs from It's Satellite , There is no such conditions of alloting from 1 Satellite itself. They can allot few from another upcoming Their sat too...

it simply means that u will not agree with what i say, tata sky had signed contract for 12 tps on gsat 10 in 2007 and i have given wnough proof but i know some people wont agree me just for the hell of it

 

[IndianMascot]

it simply means that u will not agree with what i say, tata sky had signed contract for 12 tps on gsat 10 in 2007 and i have given wnough proof but i know some people wont agree me just for the hell of it

Where is the Proof ?? Please post here once again.

 

[Mr.Bhat]

it simply means that u will not agree with what i say, tata sky had signed contract for 12 tps on gsat 10 in 2007 and i have given wnough proof but i know some people wont agree me just for the hell of it

Hmmmm... Dino G Sat 10 is launched recently and i think not even its named during their contract in 2007 . So how can they make a deal or contract which is not yet thought of during 2007 ? Even CEO didnt say its from G sat 10 only. U R mixing it up with Gsat.

 

[aumnamonarayan]

bhat sir i guess u do not know that gsat 10 was planned long ago and was suppose to b operational in 2009 but after few failed attempts, delay got launched. infact after knowing about gsat 10 only tata sky had signed contract with isro as there is a rule that if a dth firm apllies for additional tps then they r to b given the tps in 24 months